evangelicals and global warming

Excerpts from a long but interesting article in the WSJ by Andrew Higgins on the growing split among evangelicals on the topic of global warming....

Suzii Paynter, director of the public policy arm of Texas’s biggest group of Baptist churches, traveled to central Texas early this year to talk to a local preacher about a pressing “moral, biblical and theological” issue. She wanted to discuss coal.

Christians have a biblical mandate to be “good stewards of God’s creation,” Ms. Paynter says she told the Rev. Frank Brown, pastor of the Bellmead First Baptist Church here in the county where President Bush has his ranch. So, Texas Baptists should demand that controversial plans to build a slew of coal-fired power plants be put on hold.

Mr. Brown was not impressed. God, the pastor said, is “sovereign over his creation” and no amount of coal-burning will alter by a “millisecond” his divine plan for the world. Fighting environmental damage is “like chasing rabbits,” he recalls telling her. It just distracts from core Christian duties to spread the faith and protect the unborn.

Ms. Paynter and Mr. Brown, devout Baptists both, stand at opposite ends of a debate over the environment that has been roiling America’s potent but often fractious community of evangelicals. Christians have been arguing about coal in Texas, oil drilling in Alaska and hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico. The most charged issue of all is climate change, a focus of world attention this week with conferences at the United Nations and in Washington, D.C. America’s Christians are divided on basic questions: How serious is it, what causes it, and what should mankind do about it?

All sides cite the Bible....

Of course they do! The problem is that in the absence of a coherent biblical worldview of government, quoting a few passages here and there isn't much use.

The questions, as always, are ethical/biblical and practical.

Is government an ethical ends to deal with this problem. Since market participants are unlikely to deal with pollution voluntarily in an appropriate manner, one can find a legitimate role for government, since ironically, govt regulations might actually improve social efficiency.

And if government activism can be ethical, will it actually work? If not, then forget about it! This turns out to be the most difficult, controversial, and abiblical hurdle.

Beyond that is the question of whether such issues are worth exerting Christian resources. And yes: stewardship of the planet could easily join a list of "things to do" politically.

In speeches at Wheaton College in 1968, Francis Schaeffer, a hugely influential evangelical intellectual who died in 1984, criticized fellow Christians for neglecting “God’s creation.” Though a conservative, he hailed “hippies” for their attacks on “the poverty of modern man’s concept of nature.” His remarks were collected in a 1970 book, “Pollution and the Death of Man.”

But Mr. Schaeffer’s call to arms over the environment was soon drowned out by another cause he championed: the war on abortion. He became a fiery leader of pro-life Christians following the 1973 Supreme Court decision legalizing the procedure....

One fan of the late Mr. Schaeffer is the Rev. Jack Graham, chief pastor of Prestonwood Baptist Church, a stadiumlike house of worship in Plano, Texas, that seats 7,000 faithful. Mr. Graham, a former president of the Southern Baptist Convention, is a big supporter of President Bush, but says he is happy to challenge stereotypes about evangelicals. “We don’t believe the Earth is flat,” he says.

Yet his skepticism about science runs deep. Prestonwood’s bookshop stocks a host of books seeking to debunk the theory of evolution, and its parking lot is packed each Sunday with gas-guzzling sports-utility vehicles. “I have a lot more people asking, ‘How can I get through the week?’ than about the future of the planet,” says Mr. Graham. Christians, he says, have to be careful not to “worship creation instead of the Creator.”

Nonetheless, he says, they must not abuse nature, either. Mr. Graham is agnostic on the main cause of global warming but thinks science is “tilting towards human activity as contributing to the state of the world.”

Prestonwood last year began a drive to save energy and, in December, was named America’s “best green church” at a Dallas conference of church builders, suppliers and managers. It recently installed a computerized system to control its outdoor sprinklers and cut down on wasteful watering of its 140-acre grounds. The church has throttled back on air conditioning, started switching to environmentally friendly fluorescent light bulbs and taken lights out of many vending machines. A full-time “energy manager” prowls the premises after hours, leaving admonishing notes for staff who neglect to turn off lights and computers.

One big motive for all this is money. Prestonwood, which has its own school, TV station, five basketball courts and eight sports fields, has cut its utility bills by $1.1 million since summer last year, when it hired Dallas-based Energy Education Inc. to advise it on how to save energy. But, says Mr. Graham, another reason is the Bible. “Biblical Christianity,” he says, quoting Francis Schaeffer, “has a real answer to the ecological crisis.”

Graham's balance here is quite interesting and instructive.

At the end of the day, there are no clear "Christian" answers on the general question. From there, good science and economics helps to clear up the picture in part.