Congress and televangelists

A great point by the editors of Christianity Today about the dangers of forsaking the liberties of others-- that don't affect us directly, but might affect us down the road...

Interestingly, this is related to a larger failure within the culture (and ironically, here, within the Church)-- an incoherent approach to using government as an ethical, appropriate, and practical means to various (even glorious) ends.

Like many of us, Senator Chuck Grassley is concerned about the lavish lifestyles of many prosperity-gospel preachers he sees on television. "Bentleys, Rolls-Royces, corporate jets, $23,000 commodes in a multimillion-dollar home," he said on CNN. "You know, just think of a $23,000 marble commode. A lot of money going down the toilet, you could say."

But Grassley isn't like many of us. He's a United States senator. And while the U.S. government has the authority to ensure that churches and their leaders aren't breaking the law, several of the Iowa senator's comments mix an important and legitimate inquiry with a troubling government intrusion into the free exercise of religion.

Grassley, unfortunately, seems ill informed on several fronts. Take that widely published joke about the commode. It's actually an antique cabinet, not a toilet. You can see it yourself at Joyce Meyer's headquarters, part of the $5.7 million décor. You can also see at Meyer's headquarters, or at her website, audited financial statements that answer many of Grassley's questions about the ministry.

And take this comment, published on Grassley's website: "As a Christian myself, and a person who believes in tithing, I feel I have a right to know where my money goes."

But the law allows churches not to disclose their finances, even to their own members. Indeed, it was Grassley himself who introduced the Church Audit Procedures Act in 1983, which significantly limited irs investigations into church finances.

That doesn't mean churches can do whatever they want. Churches can't endorse or oppose candidates for political office. A church's net earnings cannot "inure to any private shareholder or individual," and a church can't "provide a substantial benefit to private interests."

Several of the ministries targeted by Grassley (and others not targeted) appear to provide excessive compensation to their celebrity leaders. So we encourage them to disclose their finances. We welcome IRS investigations into allegations of mismanaged funds, and we don't oppose a Senate query into whether further legislation is necessary. At the same time, it's hard to see how further legislation would be helpful. It would only amount to more government intrusion into church governance.

For now, Grassley says he's not interested in changing the law. "The IRS isn't doing its job. You don't have to change the law, you have to enforce existing law," he told CNN. Mostly, he's hoping that the investigation itself convinces the ministries to institute reforms, just as similar investigations sparked reforms in the Nature Conservancy, Red Cross, United Way, and the Smithsonian. "It's often the case that such investigations yield actions that are perfectly legal but shock the conscience," Grassley's office explained.

But churches—even ones that spout heresies like the health-and-wealth gospel—are protected by the First Amendment in ways that the Nature Conservancy and Smithsonian are not. Grassley was on dangerous ground when he told reporters, "Jesus comes into the city on a simple mule, and you got people today expanding his gospel in corporate jets. Somebody ought to raise questions about [whether] it's right or wrong." There's an important theological question here, but a Senate investigation is not the place to ask it. There's an important legal question here, too (are pastors properly using ministry-owned cars and jets in church-related work?), but Grassley undercuts the legitimacy of his own question....