Friday, June 13, 2008

standing up to pee in the ladies' room

Chuck Colson on trans-gendered bathrooms (hat tip: Linda Christiansen)...

I'd think there'd be bigger fish for Colson to fry, but this is certainly odd and interesting. (And what does Colson think about male and female homosexuals who have access to these bathrooms?)

As an economist, it gets me wondering why we have "public" bathrooms anyway. Why is this a role for government?

Or if we mean privately-owned bathrooms in relatively-public place, then the easiest solution would be that the owners would have stronger property rights over "their" bathrooms.

I wonder if Harry Blackmun would have found a Constitutional right to privacy in the bathroom...

Last week, Colorado's legislature passed—and Gov. Bill Ritter signed—a law that will open all public accommodations, including public restrooms, to anyone who wants to use them. That means men may use a women's restroom, and women may enter men's rooms. The rationale for Senate Bill 200 is that transgenders should be able to use the restroom they feel most comfortable using. Apparently, it is not important if others feel uncomfortable having their privacy violated every time they use public facilities.

The lack of privacy is not the only problem. Nobody is going to ask a man if he is trangendered before allowing him into the ladies' room. This means any man—including a child molester—could simply follow a little girl into the privacy of a public restroom. And, if a man decided to expose himself to a young girl there, who is she going to complain to? After all, restrooms, by definition, are places where one exposes the private parts of one's body....

Appalling as this law is, it gets worse. Tom Minnery of Focus on the Family points out, in the Denver Post, that the law also threatens religious liberty: Colorado's "public accommodations" law includes not only hotels and restaurants, but also any small or home-based business that offers "goods or services" to the public...

In a free country, nobody has the right to tell us what to believe—or to punish us for putting our First Amendment rights into practice. And, yes, there are men and women who deserve privacy, no matter who tells us there are no differences between the sexes.

2 Comments:

At June 13, 2008 at 8:31 PM , Blogger William Lang said...

You should visit Hotel 21C in downtown Louisville. The men's room in the lobby is remarkable. Instead of ordinary urinals, there is simply a pane of glass which goes from the ceiling to the floor. When you go near it, water begins to flow down it, and you realize you are expected to conduct your business upon the pane of glass. But the interesting part is that the glass is transparent and you can see the people walking by in the lobby. It turns out that if you are in the lobby, you cannot see into the men's room; all you see is a large mirror (a one-way mirror, of course). The last time I was there, I saw several women sneaking into the men's room, just to see this unusual wonder.

The hotel is worth a visit, by the way, for two features. One is Proof on Main, a good albeit expensive restaurant. The other are the art galleries, which are free but which contain an extremely impressive collection of contemporary art that is often playful and very engaging.

 
At June 13, 2008 at 11:37 PM , Blogger Eric Schansberg said...

Sounds like a smile.

Thanks for the heads up!

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home