Good news:
-relatively effective for a govt program like this, including wealth transfer and higher incomes in the short-run
-relatively (only) effective for the older folks in the 16-24 age range
-the residential piece was probably part of the success, with its greater ability to do "categorization, discernment" (a la Olasky) and accountability
Bad news:
-really expensive ($25K per)
-modest effectiveness-- and of that, limited to the older folks and only short-run impact on wages/income
-the only govt job training program that's been shown to have any effectiveness
Missing research question of interest (I'll email the researchers and see if they had/have anything): Were smaller centers more effective than larger centers?
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home