Thanks for coming! I plan to post a lot of interesting articles and comment on a wide range of things-- from political to religious, from private to public, from formal writing on public policy to snippets on random observations.
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
helping the poor
Lack of "resources" is at the heart of poverty. The material resources can be covered by government policy or private charity. But how to replace and supplement the rest of what's missing or deficient? Spiritual poverty, a lack of human capital, trouble in basic human relationships, knowledge of how to navigate a middle-class world, etc. (Charles Murray's In Pursuit of Happiness and Good Govt is a terrific book, applying Maslow's Hierarchy to public policy in general and poverty in particular.)
Marvin Olasky reminds us (in The Tragedy of American Compassion) that material assistance alone is ultimately stingy, since it fails to give what's truly needed. What's required? Effort, wisdom, involvement, and time-- and it's messy. So, we give material sustenance (or we vote to take it from others)-- and we're satisfied. True (or at least truer) help requires (much) more.
Reach out to your poor neighbor-- and sure, give them a basket of food. But get involved with them relationally and see what doors open for you to make a greater, lasting difference.
There can be no rich without poor, therefore we have poor. There can be no rich without usury, therefore we have usury. There is a reason the Bible, and its author Yahweh, forbids usury. Is this all understandable? We really, really need this to be understood; especially by those who preach.
The first statement is always true in relative terms, but not necessarily in absolute terms. To note, today's poor are not poor in terms from even 50 years ago. And today's poor in the U.S. are not poor in comparison to the poor in the rest of the world.
Although one might become wealthy through usury, becoming wealthy can be done easily) without usury.
Biblically, usury is forbidden, at least between believers, but it's difficult to define what constitutes usury.
First and foremost, I am saved by God's grace as manifested most clearly through the atoning death of Jesus Christ-- and thus, adopted into His family. As a result, I increasingly seek to extend His grace to others in my daily life. On the home front, I am a husband and father to four young men (two by adoption and two the more conventional way). Professionally, I am an economist who loves to teach and is active in public policy circles. Vocationally, I am an active writer and the author of three books (one on the book of Joshua; two on public policy-- one secular, one Christian). Finally, I am the co-author of a 21-month discipleship curriculum, Thoroughly Equipped (and a lighter 36-week version), for developing competent lay-leaders in the Church. Related to that work, Kurt and I have two books, Enough Horses in the Barn and Roll Up Your Sleeves.
2 Comments:
There can be no rich without poor, therefore we have poor.
There can be no rich without usury, therefore we have usury.
There is a reason the Bible, and its author Yahweh, forbids usury.
Is this all understandable? We really, really need this to be understood; especially by those who preach.
The first statement is always true in relative terms, but not necessarily in absolute terms. To note, today's poor are not poor in terms from even 50 years ago. And today's poor in the U.S. are not poor in comparison to the poor in the rest of the world.
Although one might become wealthy through usury, becoming wealthy can be done easily) without usury.
Biblically, usury is forbidden, at least between believers, but it's difficult to define what constitutes usury.
Yes, these are important work/concepts.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home