Here's the link I'm using for an electronic copy to make the comments below...
P #3 on pg. 1 is the chapter's thesis.
Pg. 3-4 describes the various and often contradictory attacks on C-- and how by reading skeptics, he was driven to embrace C as a far-better logical alternative
2nd P on p. 6 is the irony that C is either correct or terribly wrong-- from Heaven or Hell, if you will. This is similar to Lewis' on Christ's claims to deity-- as either Lord, Liar, or Lunatic.
And then with the last P on p. 8, he works through a bunch of examples.
No comments:
Post a Comment