surely, the Dems wouldn't subsidize health insurance ONLY for union workers

Wow...

Talk about a risky political strategy...This makes the EFCA look pretty tame by comparison!

From Ryan J. Donmoyer and Holly Rosenkrantz at Bloomberg (hat tip: Drudge)...

The U.S. Senate proposal to impose taxes for the first time on “gold-plated” health plans may bypass generous employee benefits negotiated by unions.

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, the chief congressional advocate of taxing some employer-provided benefits to help pay for an overhaul of the U.S. health system, says any change should exempt perks secured in existing collective-bargaining agreements, which can be in place for as long as five years.

The exception, which could make the proposal more politically palatable to Democrats from heavily unionized states such as Michigan, is adding controversy to an already contentious debate. It would shield the 12.4 percent of American workers who belong to unions from being taxed while exposing some other middle-income workers to the levy.